|
Problem Report 0029 Details
Show help for this page
Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0029 and all reviews you are authorized to see.
Report 0029 Actions
| Problem Report Number |
0029 |
|---|
| Submitter's Classification |
Specification problem |
|---|
| State |
SA Review Inconclusive |
|---|
| Resolution |
No Resolution Given |
|---|
| Problem Resolution ID |
No Resolution ID Given |
|---|
| Raised |
2012-02-14 15:21 |
|---|
| Updated |
2012-07-05 14:12 |
|---|
| Documents |
Conformance Requirements |
|---|
| Certification Program |
Open CITS Certification Program |
|---|
| Specification |
Open CITS Conformance Requirements Version 1.1 |
|---|
| Location in Spec |
Section 3.7 |
|---|
| Problem Summary |
EC01, 2 and 3 time requirement is vague |
|---|
| Problem Text |
EC01, EC02 and EC03 all qualify the experience requirement with the words
"Typically this requires x years..."
Experience has shown that this confuses applicants and board members
and it is not possible to give clear feedback in package reviews if the cited
experience is less than x years
We suggest that the word "Typically" is deleted in EC01, EC02 and EC02 for
levels 1 and 2 |
|---|
Review Information
| Review Type |
SA Review |
|---|
| Start Date |
2012-02-14 23:21 |
|---|
| Last Updated |
2012-07-05 14:12 |
|---|
| Completed |
2012-07-05 14:12 |
|---|
| Status |
Complete |
|---|
| Review Resolution |
No Resolution Given |
|---|
| Review Conclusion |
Capgemini agrees with the leaving the word typically out like we
discussed during our call in april. |
|---|
Problem Reporting System Options:
|
|
|
|
