|
Problem Report 0029 Details
Show help for this page
Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0029.
Report 0029 Actions
| Problem Report Number |
0029 |
|---|
| Submitter's Classification |
Specification problem |
|---|
| State |
SA Review Inconclusive |
|---|
| Resolution |
No Resolution Given |
|---|
| Problem Resolution ID |
No Resolution ID Given |
|---|
| Raised |
2012-02-14 15:21 |
|---|
| Updated |
2012-07-05 14:12 |
|---|
| Documents |
Conformance Requirements |
|---|
| Certification Program |
Open CITS Certification Program |
|---|
| Specification |
Open CITS Conformance Requirements Version 1.1 |
|---|
| Location in Spec |
Section 3.7 |
|---|
| Problem Summary |
EC01, 2 and 3 time requirement is vague |
|---|
| Problem Text |
EC01, EC02 and EC03 all qualify the experience requirement with the words
"Typically this requires x years..."
Experience has shown that this confuses applicants and board members
and it is not possible to give clear feedback in package reviews if the cited
experience is less than x years
We suggest that the word "Typically" is deleted in EC01, EC02 and EC02 for
levels 1 and 2 |
|---|
Review Information
| Review Type |
SA Review |
|---|
| Start Date |
2012-02-14 23:21 |
|---|
| Last Updated |
2012-07-05 14:12 |
|---|
| Completed |
2012-07-05 14:12 |
|---|
| Status |
Complete |
|---|
| Review Resolution |
No Resolution Given |
|---|
| Review Conclusion |
Capgemini agrees with the leaving the word typically out like we
discussed during our call in april. |
|---|
Problem Reporting System Options:
|
|
|
|
