|
Problem Report 0025 Details
Show help for this page
Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0025 and all reviews you are authorized to see.
Report 0025 Actions
Problem Report Number |
0025 |
Submitter's Classification |
Specification problem |
State |
Resolved |
Resolution |
Certification System Deficiency (CSD) |
Problem Resolution ID |
CSD.TG.0008 |
Raised |
2008-04-07 23:40 |
Updated |
2009-03-10 00:55 |
Published |
2009-03-10 00:55 |
Product Standard |
TOGAF 8 Training |
Certification Program |
TOGAF Certified by The Open Group |
Specification |
TOGAF 8 Training Product Standard |
Location in Spec |
Conformance Requirements |
Problem Summary |
Issues with the current requirements for TOGAF Training certification |
Problem Description [CSC template]
|
This is an issue for the attention of the CSC
1.Issue Description:
[ describe the problem in detail so that someone not familiar with the
issue can understand the matter]
What is the problem we are trying to fix?
In the following section we define two terms:
* ?Direct certification?, which is for candidates taking the
examination at a Prometric test center
* ?Indirect certification?, which is for candidates satisfactorily
completing a certified training course
There is a high confidence that direct certification for TOGAF is
repeatable, reproducible and objective since every candidate is
subject to the same conformance assessment: a written examination. Any
instruction or self study that preceded the taking of the exam is
irrelevant,
since all applicants are assessed using a single standardized test
method. This
closely mirrors The Open Group?s technology certification programs. However
there can be less certainty about the repeatability between the
direct and indirect certification routes and between individuals certified
though the indirect route.
It is observed that:
* Individuals certified through indirect certification do not take the
standardized examination.
* If indirect certification is partly based on a training provider?s
course evaluation of a course attendee, it is difficult to know the
quality of the evaluation or how it compares to the standardized
examination, or to other training providers.
* While the training course CSQ provides information that the entire
TOGAF curriculum has been addressed by the course, there is no
information about the depth and breadth of the coverage of the
curriculum.
It is reasonably certain that
* The effectiveness of the instruction will depend not only on the
curriculum used but also on the instructor?s skills, background and
experience.
* Not all applicants will learn at the same rate so the knowledge level
acquired will differ between individuals attending exactly the same
training course.
- Human beings learn ?differently?, some visual, some
auditory. It may be necessary to provide learning
experiences for both types of learners.
- Others may also suffer physical disabilities that may
or may not be accommodated by a particular learning
experience.
Thus, the problem is that we need to find a way to assure that all
instructors are distributing the same knowledge, including the depth and
breadth of
knowledge. Furthermore, that they do so in a manner which is most
effective and equivalent to that which is needed to pass the
standardized public examination.
2. Issue Impact:
[describe the impact of not dealing with this issue]
Without this assurance, there is a risk that the TOGAF certification
program
and other related people certification programs, that take the same
approach, may fall into disrepute.
* Unknown equivalence between certification providers
* Unknown equivalence between certification by
training and examination
* Training certified for content not quality
* Decentralized ?no verification of
- Certification approval process
- Quality of instruction
- Accuracy of material
3. Issue Urgency:
[enter Urgent or Not urgent AND Important or Not important per Steven
Covey's time management matrix]
Urgent and important
4. Issue Time Window:
[enter the timeframe in which this issue must be addressed, else the
negative impact will be realized]
August 2008
5. Willingness to participate in follow-up:
yes. A discussion paper is available for CSC members at
https://www.opengroup.org/projects/archmain/protected/doc.tpl?gdid=14381 |
Review Information
Review Type |
SA Review |
Start Date |
2008-04-07 23:40 |
Last Updated |
2009-03-10 00:54 |
Completed |
2009-03-10 00:54 |
Status |
Complete |
Review Resolution |
Certification System Deficiency (CSD) |
Review Conclusion |
This has been addressed in the TOGAF 9 certification program. |
Problem Reporting System Options:
|
|
|
|
|