Home • About Us • A-Z Index • Search * Contact Us • Register • Login • Press • Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System

Problem Report 2264 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 2264.

Report 2264 Actions

    Problem Report Number 2264
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0636
    Raised 2003-07-30 09:41
    Updated 2003-08-08 14:14
    Published 2003-08-08 14:14
    Product Standard Commands and Utilities V3 (UNIX 98)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSC version 5.2.3
    Test Identification /tset/POSIX.upe/ex/ex_04.ex 202
    Specification Commands and Utilities Issue 5
    Problem Summary /tset/POSIX.upe/ex/ex_04.ex 42 Failed
    Problem Text A waiver is requested for this.
    Test Output
    ***********************************************************************

    /tset/POSIX.upe/ex/ex_04.ex 42 Failed

    Test Information:

    expected current line 3, was line 2
    Command failed: 'checkline ex_data_1 3'
    expected current line 4, was line 3
    Command failed: 'checkline ex_data_2 4'


    ***********************************************************************

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date 2003-07-30 09:41
    Last Updated 2003-07-30 21:36
    Completed 2003-07-30 21:36
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation Rejected (REJ)
    Review Response This failure is already covered by PIN.X.0117.

    The test number is actually 202. The VSC5.2.3 report writer produces
    misleading test numbers, but the correct number is output in the
    test information. Unfortunately, in the output supplied by the
    submitter the relevant line has been removed, but it would have been:

    Assertion #202 (C): setting of current line after <range>move command

    I have verified that tp202 is the 42nd test in ex_04.sh (which is
    where the report writer gets the number 42 from).

    I recommend that on publication, this PR is edited and the test ID
    field is changed to show the test number as 202, in order to avoid
    confusion when users search the PRs by test ID.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date 2003-07-30 20:36
    Last Updated 2003-08-08 14:12
    Completed 2003-08-08 14:12
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Review Conclusion This failure is already covered by PIN.X.0117.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   

Contact the Certification Authority