|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 2239 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 2239.
Report 2239 Actions
Problem Report Number 2239 Submitter's Classification Specification problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0628 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published 1999-03-26 08:00 Product Standard CORBA Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSORB version 1.1.0 Test Identification c/hdr/DII/ORB/send_multiple_requests 0 Problem Summary PG4O.00003 In tset/c/hdr/DII/ORB/send_multiple_requests.c, VSOrb 1.1.0 test examines our orb on the assumption that send_multiple_requests() is defined like the following. CORBA_Status CORBA_send_multiple_reques... Problem Text
In tset/c/hdr/DII/ORB/send_multiple_requests.c,
VSOrb 1.1.0 test examines our orb on the assumption that
send_multiple_requests() is defined like the following.
CORBA_Status CORBA_send_multiple_requests(
CORBA_ORB orb,
CORBA_Request reqs[],
CORBA_long count,
CORBA_Flags invoke_flags,
CORBA_Environment *env
);
But, according to section 4.3.2 of CORBA 2.1 specification,
send_multiple_requests() is defined like the following.
/* C */
CORBA_Status CORBA_send_multiple_requests(
CORBA_Request reqs[],
CORBA_Environment *env,
CORBA_long count,
CORBA_Flags invoke_flags
);
Test Output
[required-test-output]Review Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
We believe Section 4.3.2 is incorrect according to the general C
mapping rules (as are many of the other examples). We are following
rules defined in Section 17.17 which states that every function signature
takes the object as the first parameter and an Environment object as the
last parameter.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution No Resolution Given Review Conclusion
An interpretation from OMG is required to determine whether Section
4.3.2 or Section 17.17 of CORBA 2.1 is definitive.
Review Type Expert Group Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution No Resolution Given Review Conclusion
OMG has determined that Section 17.17 of CORBA 2.1 is definitive. The
material in section 4.3.2 will be changed in a future CORBA revision to
agree with it.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 2239
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority