Home • About Us • A-Z Index • Search * Contact Us • Register • Login • Press • Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System

Problem Report 2138 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 2138.

Report 2138 Actions

    Problem Report Number 2138
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0605
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published null
    Product Standard Motif Toolkit
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSM version 4.0.0
    Test Identification funcs/XmClipboardInquireFormat 3
    Problem Summary PG4M.00001 It's the test case fault. It does not initialize the display, window and so on. Here is the difference after fixed: $ diff clpinqfmt.c.fixed clpinqfmt.c.org 390,398d389 < /* added */ < start_func(); ...
    Problem Text

    It's the test case fault. It does not initialize the display, window and so on.
    Here is the difference after fixed:
    $ diff clpinqfmt.c.fixed clpinqfmt.c.org
    390,398d389
    < /* added */
    < start_func();
    <
    < w_info = InitCondsShell(argc, NULL, "XmClipboardInquireFormat");
    < dsp = XtDisplay(w_info->widget);
    < win = XtWindow(w_info->widget);
    <
    < test_abort = False;
    <
    $

    By the way, XmClipboardInquireFormat test case(s) does find a bug in
    this function and it's fixed.

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    We recommend this request be refused.

    When all tests are run in sequence these variables would have been
    initialized in test 1 and test 3 would succeed.

    In a branding run, all tests must be run in sequence. Although we
    agree this is a bug in the code, this IR cannot be recommended for
    waiver because IRs can only be approved for issues which impact
    branding.


    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Review Conclusion
    This request is refused.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   

Contact the Certification Authority