HomeAbout Us A-Z IndexSearch * Contact Us Register LoginPress Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System


Problem Report 2071 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 2071.


Report 2071 Actions


    Problem Report Number 2071
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.1042
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published 1998-04-01 08:00
    Product Standard Internationalised System Calls and Libraries Extended V2 (UNIX 98)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSTH version 5.1.2
    Test Identification PTHR.os/all/pthread_cancel 7
    Problem Summary TSD5TH.00039 Within test case 7, the subtest for munlock() fails when a call to the function mlock() with EPERM - The calling process does not have the appropriate privilege to perform the requested operation. On ...
    Problem Text

    Within test case 7, the subtest for munlock() fails when
    a call to the function mlock() with

    EPERM - The calling process does not have the appropriate
    privilege to perform the requested operation.

    On page 522 of XSH5 for mlock it states

    The appropriate privilege is required to lock process
    memory with mlock().

    The implementation under test requires that the process have
    super-user privilege. The test case is thus not portable
    because it does not provide appropriate privileges for mlock().

    Test Output

    10|0 /tset/PTHR.os/all/pthread_cancel/T.pthread_cancel 14:34:18|TC Start,
    scenario ref 1-0, ICs: {7} 15|0 3.1-lite 1|TCM Start
    400|0 7 1 14:34:18|IC Start
    200|0 7 14:34:18|TP Start
    520|0 7 00013290 1 1|A cancellation point shall not occur when a thread
    520|0 7 00013290 1 2|is executing any of the following C standard or
    520|0 7 00013290 1 3|ISO/IEC 9945-1:1996 functions:
    520|0 7 00013290 1 4|_exit
    520|0 7 00013290 1 5|abort
    520|0 7 00013290 1 6|abs
    520|0 7 00013290 246 2|Testing mq_unlink()
    520|0 7 00013290 248 1|mq_unlink() passed
    520|0 7 00013290 248 2|Testing munlock()
    520|0 7 00013290 248 3|The setup function failed
    520|0 7 00013290 248 4|munlock() unresolved
    520|0 7 00013290 248 5|Testing munlockall()
    520|0 7 00013290 250 1|munlockall() passed
    520|0 7 00013290 250 2|Testing munmap()
    520|0 7 00013290 252 1|munmap() passed
    520|0 7 00013290 252 2|Testing pathconf()
    520|0 7 00013290 254 1|pathconf() passed
    520|0 7 00013290 444 2|Testing sigpending()
    520|0 7 00013290 446 1|sigpending() passed
    520|0 7 00013290 446 2|Testing sigprocmask()
    520|0 7 00013290 448 1|sigprocmask() passed




    520|0 7 00013290 448 2|Testing sigqueue()
    510|0|system 0: Abandoning testset: caught unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
    220|0 7 7 14:34:21|NORESULT (auto-generated by TCC)
    80|0 1 14:34:21|TC End, scenario ref 1-0
    900|14:34:21|TCC End

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    We agree with the applicant and recommend that a waiver be granted on
    the basis of a test suite deficiency.


    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Review Conclusion
    This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.


    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   


Contact the Certification Authority