|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 1992 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 1992.
Report 1992 Actions
Problem Report Number 1992 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0578 Raised 1996-02-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published null Product Standard Transport Service XTI Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VST version 4.1.3 Test Identification XTI.os/cots/rcv/T.rcv 5 Problem Summary PGT4R.007 t_rcv(), assertion 5 should be marked unsupported when TCP is the transport provider. On Page 199 (Appendix B), Network Services, XPG4 the following is stated: "* T_MORE flag and TSDUs The notion of T... Problem Text
t_rcv(), assertion 5 should be marked unsupported when TCP is the
transport provider. On Page 199 (Appendix B), Network Services, XPG4
the following is stated:
"* T_MORE flag and TSDUs
The notion of TSDU is not supported by a TCP transport provider, so the
T_MORE flag will be ignored when TCP is used. ...."Test Output
400|12 5 1 13:30:42|IC Start
200|12 5 13:30:42|TP Start
520|12 5 00013382 1 1|Unexpected event on TCP endpoint
520|12 5 00013382 1 2|Expected 8 (T_EXDATA), actual 4 (T_DATA)
220|12 5 2 13:30:42|UNRESOLVED
410|12 5 1 13:30:42|IC EndReview Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
While it is accepted that the bytes of data prior to the urgent pointer
could be returned as ordinary data. the XTI specification states in Appendix
B Page 113 under the description of t_look() that the T_EXDATA remains set
until all data up to the byte pointed to by the TCP urgent pointer has been
received. The results from the test show this not to be the case and it is
recommended that this request be refused.
(Note: there is a different fault which occurs with this test where the
bytes prior to the urgent pointer where expected to be taken as expedited
data, which is not necessarily the case for TCP. This fault should not be
effecting the test results as shown above.)
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 1992
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority