Home • About Us • A-Z Index • Search * Contact Us • Register • Login • Press • Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System

Problem Report 1947 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 1947.

Report 1947 Actions

    Problem Report Number 1947
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0974
    Raised 1995-10-27 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published 1995-11-07 08:00
    Product Standard Transport Service XTI
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VST version 4.1.3
    Test Identification XTI.os/clts/T.rcvudata{1} 1,3"
    Problem Summary TSDT4.012 This TSD is being filed with regard to t_rcvudata{1,3} and t_sndudata{1,2,3}. A related problem, whose origin is exhibited for the master side t_rcvudata{1,3} assertions, and for the slave side t_sndu...
    Problem Text
    This TSD is being filed with regard to t_rcvudata{1,3} and t_sndudata{1,2,3}.
    A related problem, whose origin is exhibited for the master side
    t_rcvudata{1,3} assertions, and for the slave side t_sndudata{1,2,3} assertions.

    For t_rcvudata{1,3} on the master, 'c_rcvudata()' is called which allocates an
    options buffer with a size of RCVUDATA_OPT bytes (10). For the t_sndudata{1,2,3}
    assertions on the slave, 'call_rcvudata()' is called, which allocates an
    options buffer with a size of SNDUDATA_OPT bytes (64). Each of these options
    buffers are used to gain access to the values for options data which are
    negotiated with the transport provider as a result of a call to t_rcvudata().
    Option data for UDP/IP is supposed to be present in the options buffer on
    return from the t_rcvudata() call for these assertions. However, the amount of
    buffer space which is required to successfully transfer the data back to the
    calling process is greater than 64 bytes. The buffer space required for such
    operations should be determined on the basis of the options field of the t_info
    structure returned by t_getinfo() (Or a buffer whose size which is minimally,
    say, 512 bytes, would be a more reasonable). Thus each of the t_rcvudata()
    calls for the each of the master side t_rcvudata{1,3} assertions and each slave
    side t_sndudata{1,2,3} assertions fail with a TBUFOVFLW error.

    On the slave side, t_sndudata{1,2,3} calls, the assertions continue to
    fail, once the size of the buffer is increased, due to additional testing which
    is present to determine the presence of the actual return of option data from
    the t_rcvudata() call. The additional testing code is errant as well, as it
    notes failure for the return of options data which is actually expected to be
    returned!

    Test Output
    10|55 /tset/XTI.os/clts/rcvudata/T.rcvudata 19:04:46|TC Start, scenario ref 25-1
    15|55 2.3 9|TCM Start
    400|55 1 1 19:04:47|IC Start
    200|55 1 19:04:47|TP Start
    520|55 1 00014175 1 1|t_rcvudata() on UDP endpoint
    520|55 1 00014175 1 2|RETURN VALUES: expected: 0, observed: -1
    520|55 1 00014175 1 3|TERRNO VALUES: expected: 0 (NO ERROR), observed: 11 (TBUFO
    VFLW)
    220|55 1 2 19:04:47|UNRESOLVED
    410|55 1 1 19:04:47|IC End
    200|55 3 19:04:47|TP Start
    520|55 3 00014175 1 1|t_rcvudata() on UDP endpoint
    520|55 3 00014175 1 2|RETURN VALUES: expected: 0, observed: -1
    520|55 3 00014175 1 3|TERRNO VALUES: expected: 0 (NO ERROR), observed: 11 (TBUFO
    VFLW)
    220|55 3 2 19:04:47|UNRESOLVED
    410|55 3 1 19:04:47|IC End


    10|67 /tset/XTI.os/clts/sndudata/T.sndudata 19:05:33|TC Start, scenario ref 29-1
    15|67 2.3 12|TCM Start
    400|67 1 1 19:05:33|IC Start
    200|67 1 19:05:33|TP Start
    520|67 1 00117880 1 1|t_sndudata() on UDP endpoint
    520|67 1 00117880 1 2|RETURN VALUES: expected: 0, observed: -1
    520|67 1 00117880 1 3|TERRNO VALUES: expected: 0 (NO ERROR), observed: 11 (TBUFO
    VFLW)
    220|67 1 2 19:05:33|UNRESOLVED
    410|67 1 1 19:05:33|IC End
    400|67 2 1 19:05:33|IC Start
    200|67 2 19:05:33|TP Start
    520|67 2 00117880 1 1|t_sndudata() on UDP endpoint
    520|67 2 00117880 1 2|RETURN VALUES: expected: 0, observed: -1
    520|67 2 00117880 1 3|TERRNO VALUES: expected: 0 (NO ERROR), observed: 11 (TBUFO
    VFLW)
    220|67 2 2 19:05:33|UNRESOLVED
    410|67 2 1 19:05:33|IC End
    400|67 3 1 19:05:33|IC Start
    200|67 3 19:05:33|TP Start
    520|67 3 00117880 1 1|t_sndudata() on UDP endpoint
    520|67 3 00117880 1 2|RETURN VALUES: expected: 0, observed: -1
    520|67 3 00117880 1 3|TERRNO VALUES: expected: 0 (NO ERROR), observed: 11 (TBUFO
    VFLW)
    220|67 3 2 19:05:34|UNRESOLVED
    410|67 3 1 19:05:34|IC End

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    It is accepted that this is a fault in the test suite and it is recommended that
    a waiver is granted on the grounds of a Test Suite Deficiency.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Review Conclusion
    This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   

Contact the Certification Authority