|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 1844 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 1844.
Report 1844 Actions
Problem Report Number 1844 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0921 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published 1993-08-24 08:00 Product Standard X Window System Display Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSW version 4.1.1 Test Identification CH05/strnmdclr 2 Problem Summary TSD4W.00084 Test is comparing 16-bit color values to hardware-dependent color values. Problem Text
In this test case, rgb color values are stored into the colormap using
XStoreColor. When doing this, the 16bit integer color values are cut by
the server to the number of significant bits in the color specification
the hardware allows (as available by xdpyinfo). After applying
XStoreNamedColor, the rgb values in the current colormap are compared to
the values given to XStoreColor (using XQueryColor). And here is the error:
XQueryColor gets the hardware dependent color values (Xlib C language
binding, p. 85), in our case with 6 significant bits. So, because the
test suite does not take care of this, an error occurs.
Note that the flags given to XStoreNamedColor are handled correctly.Test Output
10|0 /tset/CH05/strnmdclr/strnmdclr 15:11:48|TC Start, scenario ref 22-1, ICs {all}
15|0 1.10 1|TCM Start
520|0 0 3544 1 1|TRACE:NAME: XStoreNamedColor
400|0 2 1 15:11:59|IC Start
200|0 2 15:11:59|TP Start
520|0 2 3544 1 1|TRACE:--- Running test with visual class PseudoColor, depth 4
520|0 2 3544 1 2|TRACE:--- Testing with supported visual class PseudoColor
520|0 2 3544 1 3|TRACE:Attempting XStoreNamedColor() for class PseudoColor, color red
520|0 2 3544 1 4|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 48128 b 48128
instead of r 49151 g 49151 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 5|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 16384 g 48128 b 48128
instead of r 16384 g 49151 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 6|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 16384 b 48128
instead of r 49151 g 16384 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 7|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 16384 g 16384 b 48128
instead of r 16384 g 16384 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 8|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 48128 b 16384
instead of r 49151 g 49151 b 16384.
520|0 2 3544 1 9|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 16384 g 48128 b 16384
instead of r 16384 g 49151 b 16384.
520|0 2 3544 1 10|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 16384 b 16384
instead of r 49151 g 16384 b 16384.
520|0 2 3544 1 11|CHECK:XStoreNamedColor-2 1, line 277
520|0 2 3544 1 12|TRACE:--- Running test with visual class GrayScale, depth 4
520|0 2 3544 1 13|TRACE:--- Testing with supported visual class GrayScale
520|0 2 3544 1 14|TRACE:Attempting XStoreNamedColor() for class GrayScale, color red
520|0 2 3544 1 15|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 48128 b 48128
instead of r 49151 g 49151 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 16|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 16384 g 48128 b 48128
instead of r 16384 g 49151 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 17|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 16384 b 48128
instead of r 49151 g 16384 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 18|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 16384 g 16384 b 48128
instead of r 16384 g 16384 b 49151.
520|0 2 3544 1 19|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 48128 b 16384
instead of r 49151 g 49151 b 16384.
520|0 2 3544 1 20|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 16384 g 48128 b 16384
instead of r 16384 g 49151 b 16384.
520|0 2 3544 1 21|REPORT:XStoreNamedColor() RGB value r 48128 g 16384 b 16384
instead of r 49151 g 16384 b 16384.
520|0 2 3544 1 22|CHECK:XStoreNamedColor-2 2, line 277
520|0 2 3544 1 23|TRACE:--- Running test with visual class StaticGray, depth 4
520|0 2 3544 1 24|TRACE:--- Running test with visual class StaticColor, depth 4
220|0 2 1 15:12:00|FAIL
410|0 2 1 15:12:00|IC End
80|0 0 15:12:04|TC EndReview Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
This is accepted as a test suite deficiency and a permanent waiver is
recommended.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) Review Conclusion
This is an agreed test suite deficiency.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 1844
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority