|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 1745 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 1745.
Report 1745 Actions
Problem Report Number 1745 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0528 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published null Product Standard Window System Application Interface V2 Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSW version 5.0.0 Test Identification Xlib7/lkpclr 2 Problem Summary PG4W.00056 This IR does includes journal output but no reasons for interpretation. Problem Text
Test Output
SECTION: Xlib7
TEST CASE: XLookupColor
TEST PURPOSE #2
Assertion XLookupColor-2.(A)
Upper and lower case characters in the color_name argument
refer to the same colour.
METH: For each supported visual type:
METH: Create a colomap with alloc set to AllocNone.
METH: Look up the rgb value of the colour name XT_GOOD_COLORNAME
METH: in the database with XLookupNamedColor.
METH: Look up the rbg value of the colour name XT_GOOD_COLORNAME,
METH: with alternating characters in alternating case,
METH: in the colourmap with XAllocNamedColor.
METH: Verify that the function returned non-zero.
METH: Verify that the exact and closest supported rbg values from both calls
METH: are identical.
REPORT: XLookupColor failed to return non-zero with color Ed.
REPORT: XLookupColor failed to return non-zero with color Ed.
REPORT: XLookupColor failed to return non-zero with color Ed.
REPORT: XLookupColor failed to return non-zero with color Ed.
REPORT: XLookupColor failed to return non-zero with color Ed.
REPORT: XLookupColor failed to return non-zero with color Ed.
FAILReview Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
We recommend this request be refused.
IRs must provide reasoning for why an interpretation is needed for the
journal output provided. If the test is believed to be in error or
the standard is unclear or gray, sufficient reasoning and rationale
must be provided to support the request.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 1745
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority