Home • About Us • A-Z Index • Search * Contact Us • Register • Login • Press • Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System

Problem Report 1732 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 1732.

Report 1732 Actions

    Problem Report Number 1732
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0515
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published null
    Product Standard Window System Application Interface V2
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSW version 5.0.0
    Test Identification Xt11/tvastvals 5
    Problem Summary PG4W.00069 This IR does includes journal output but no reasons for interpretation.
    Problem Text

    Test Output
    SECTION: Xt11

    TEST CASE: XtVaSetValues

    TEST PURPOSE #5
    Assertion XtVaSetValues-5.(A)
    When the class of the specified widget's parent is a
    subclass of constraintWidgetClass a call to void
    XtVaSetValues(object,...) shall call the constraint
    set_values procedures from constraintWidgetClass on down to
    the parent's class, passing to them the specified widget as
    an argument.
    PREP: Initialize toolkit, Open display and Create topLevel root widget
    PREP: Create avsform widget in boxw1 widget
    PREP: Create avsform2 widget in avsform widget
    PREP: Create windows for widgets and map them
    PREP: Set constraint resource values for pushb_good widget
    TEST: set_values procedure two levels up was invoked first
    ERROR: Expected procedure invocation to be #1, is #0
    TEST: set_values procedure of parent was invoked second
    ERROR: Expected procedure invocation to be #2, is #0
    FAIL

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    We recommend this request be refused.

    IRs must provide reasoning for why an interpretation is needed for the
    journal output provided. If the test is believed to be in error or
    the standard is unclear or gray, sufficient reasoning and rationale
    must be provided to support the request.


    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Review Conclusion
    This request is refused.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   

Contact the Certification Authority