HomeAbout Us A-Z IndexSearch * Contact Us Register LoginPress Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System


Problem Report 1725 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 1725.


Report 1725 Actions


    Problem Report Number 1725
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0508
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published null
    Product Standard Window System Application Interface V2
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSW version 5.0.0
    Test Identification Xlib14/mbdtext 1
    Problem Summary PG4W.00076 This was refused because it is a duplicate. Use TSD4W.00134 instead.
    Problem Text

    Test Output
    SECTION: Xlib14

    TEST CASE: XmbDrawText

    TEST PURPOSE #1
    Assertion XmbDrawText-1.(C)
    If the implementation is X11R5 or later: On a call to
    XmbDrawText each of the text items, specifying a string
    chars of 8-bit characters from a font with interstring
    spacing given by delta, shall be drawn in turn.
    METH: For all locales, for all fontsets, draw all the
    METH: characters between 0&255 in all the xtest fonts, by setting
    METH: up XTestItem structs to point to groups of characters at a time.
    METH: Pixmap verify. Only one visual will be tested, since XDrawText is
    METH: being tested elsewhere and XmbDrawText eventually calls the same
    METH: routines as XDrawText.
    REPORT: A total of 1053 out of 9000 pixels were bad
    REPORT: Pixel check failed. See file Err0000.err for results
    REPORT: A total of 1561 out of 9000 pixels were bad
    REPORT: Pixel check failed. See file Err0001.err for results
    REPORT: A total of 1767 out of 9000 pixels were bad
    REPORT: Pixel check failed. See file Err0002.err for results
    REPORT: A total of 808 out of 9000 pixels were bad
    REPORT: Pixel check failed. See file Err0003.err for results
    FAIL

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    The submitter is correct but a recent ruling regarding this issue
    exists. To avoid the confusion duplicate rulings regarding the same
    issue might cause we recommend this request be refused and the submitter
    use TSD4W.00134 instead.

    Note that no reasoning was provided by the submitter.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Review Conclusion
    This request is refused.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   


Contact the Certification Authority