Home • About Us • A-Z Index • Search * Contact Us • Register • Login • Press • Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System

Problem Report 1549 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 1549.

Report 1549 Actions

    Problem Report Number 1549
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0831
    Raised 2000-08-27 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published 2000-09-18 08:00
    Product Standard Internationalised System Calls and Libraries Extended V2 (UNIX 98)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSU version 5.0.4
    Test Identification CAPIbase/lockf 43
    Problem Summary TSD4U.00292 lseek() fails during test setup because the offset is greater than the maximum file size
    Problem Text
    The testcase attempts to lseek() using the following code:

    #define MAXOFF_VAL(x) pow((double)2, (double)((x*8)-1))-1

    offset = (off_t)MAXOFF_VAL(sizeof(off_t)) - OFF_TBELOW;
    if ((ret = lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET)) == -1) {

    The offset value is calculated off the size of off_t, which on our
    implementation is 8 bytes. This gives an offset of around 2^63. However,
    our max filesize for a LFS file is 64 GB (2^36). Thus lseek() returns the
    EINVAL(errno 22) error above. There are no UNIX98 requirements for the
    maximum LFS file size.

    Note, that fixing this will also invalidate the method used for testing lockf()
    EOVERFLOW errors. Since in IPL32_OFFBIG, off_t will have a max value of
    2^63 and the file size limit can be alot less, using a size of 512 bytes
    as the region to lock will not work.
    Test Output
    TEST PURPOSE #43
    EOVERFLOW in errno and return -1 on a call to int
    lockf(int fildes, int function, off_t size) when size
    is not 0 and the offset of the last byte in the
    requested section cannot be represented correctly in
    an object of type off_t.
    PREP: Check for existence of programming environments
    PREP: Obtain off_t size in XBS5_ILP32_OFF32 environment
    PREP: Obtain off_t size in XBS5_ILP32_OFFBIG environment
    PREP: Obtain off_t size in XBS5_LP64_OFF64 environment
    PREP: Obtain off_t size in XBS5_LPBIG_OFFBIG environment
    TEST: Execute test built in XBS5_ILP32_OFF32 (32-bit off_t) environment that:
    opens a file for writing,
    set the offset below that which can be represented in an off_t
    verifies lockf returns -1 and sets errno to EOVERFLOW when offset
    of the last byte in request cannot be represented in an off_t object
    TEST: Execute test built in XBS5_ILP32_OFFBIG (64-bit off_t) environment that:
    opens a file for writing,
    set the offset below that which can be represented in an off_t
    verifies lockf returns -1 and sets errno to EOVERFLOW when offset
    of the last byte in request cannot be represented in an off_t object
    ERROR: In test program: lseek() failed, errno = 22(Invalid argument)
    TEST: Execute test built in XBS5_LP64_OFF64 (64-bit off_t) environment that:
    opens a file for writing,
    set the offset below that which can be represented in an off_t
    verifies lockf returns -1 and sets errno to EOVERFLOW when offset
    of the last byte in request cannot be represented in an off_t object
    ERROR: In test program: lseek() failed, errno = 22(Invalid argument)
    TEST: Execute test built in XBS5_LPBIG_OFFBIG (64-bit off_t) environment that:
    opens a file for writing,
    set the offset below that which can be represented in an off_t
    verifies lockf returns -1 and sets errno to EOVERFLOW when offset
    of the last byte in request cannot be represented in an off_t object
    ERROR: In test program: lseek() failed, errno = 22(Invalid argument)
    43 UNRESOLVED

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    This is accepted as a fault in the test suite.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Review Conclusion
    This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   

Contact the Certification Authority