|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 1209 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 1209.
Report 1209 Actions
Problem Report Number 1209 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0411 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published null Product Standard Internationalised System Calls and Libraries Extended (UNIX 95) Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSU version 4.1.0 Test Identification CAPIheaders/errno.h 1-36 Problem Summary PG4U.00056 This test may fail on implementations due to improper initialization. Problem Text
This test may fail on implementations due to improper initialization.
Assertions 1-36 fail to produce results on our implementation because
of a segment violation that occurs when running test36. The sigsegv
occurs because eindex is never initialized in the testcase. Adding
the following statement eindex=0; after the first tet_infoline()
allows the testcase to run completely.
However, another problem with test36 is then found, the source contains
the following statement:
/*must be updated if number of values changes in XPG4 or 1170 spec*/
#define NERRNO 40+35 /*#XPG4 errnos + #1170 errnos*/
When I count the number in the spec XPG4 V2 XSH, pages 750-751, I get
76 signal defines. This causes ENODATA never to be checked.Test Output
110|0 /tset/CAPIheaders/herrno/herrno1 11:23:56|Build Start, scenario ref 74-40
130|0 0 11:23:57|Build End
10|1 /tset/CAPIheaders/herrno/herrno1 11:23:57|TC Start, scenario ref 74-40
80|1 1011 11:23:59|TC End, Test Case terminated by signal 11
TEST PURPOSE #36
The values defined for errno in errno.h
shall be distinct, except that the value for EWOULDBLOCK
may be equal to the value for EAGAIN.
PREP: Collect all the values
TEST: Uniqueness
ERROR: Value for EISCONN (75) equal to value for .
36 FAIL
Review Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
We recommend this request be refused.
Although we agree that eindex is not properly initialized
it is not clear to us this is causing the reported falures.
First, output for all tests claimed to be in error is not
provided. Output is required for all tests before we can
recommend approval.
More importantly, the results provided indicate the test FAILed.
If a SIGSEGV was generated we would expect an UNRESOLVED result.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 1209
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority