Home • About Us • A-Z Index • Search * Contact Us • Register • Login • Press • Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System

Problem Report 1145 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 1145.

Report 1145 Actions

    Problem Report Number 1145
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0347
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published null
    Product Standard Internationalised System Calls and Libraries Extended (UNIX 95)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSU version 4.1.1
    Test Identification base/readv 22
    Problem Summary PG4U.00124 This was refused because it is a duplicate. Use TSD4U.00175 instead.
    Problem Text
    The test still fails because the implementation does not fully support
    the general terminal interface for a master pseudo-terminal. The
    terminal support for master pseudo-terminals has been changed such
    that the preparation failures now occur in response to tcsetattr()
    rather than to tcgetattr().
    Test Output
    A call to ssize_t readv(int fildes, const struct iovec
    *iov, int iovcnt) when the function is interrupted by
    a signal after it has successfully read some data
    shall return the number of bytes read.
    PREP: Read IOV_MAX system configuration
    PREP: Allocate and initialize I/O buffers
    PREP: Open and initialize the terminal files
    ERROR: tcsetattr failed, errno = 22(EINVAL - Invalid argument)
    PREP: Open and initialize the terminal files
    ERROR: tcsetattr failed, errno = 22(EINVAL - Invalid argument)
    CLEANUP: Free iovec buffers
    22 UNRESOLVED

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    The submitter is correct but a recent ruling regarding this issue
    exists. To avoid the confusion duplicate rulings regarding the same
    issue might cause we recommend this request be refused and the submitter
    use TSD4U.00175 instead.

    The reason is the same, but the IUT fails in a different place, but the result
    code is the same.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Review Conclusion
    This request is refused.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   

Contact the Certification Authority