HomeAbout Us A-Z IndexSearch * Contact Us Register LoginPress Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System


Problem Report 0968 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 0968.


Report 0968 Actions


    Problem Report Number 0968
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0483
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published 1995-08-12 08:00
    Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSC version 4.1.4
    Test Identification POSIX.upe/nm 16
    Problem Summary TSD4C.00026 test may fail if object contiains symbol entries without names
    Problem Text
    This test may fail in some cases even though the output conforms
    to standards and does not violate the assertion.

    nm writes the name list of an object file. Consider the case
    where there is a symbol in the name list which has a null name
    (as in the first symbol listed below):

    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: f -
    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: .__divss U 3200
    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: .__mulh U 3100
    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: .__start T 100001c8 78
    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: .access T 10002fc8
    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: .access t 10002fc8 24
    /vsc/xcuts/Lib/Data/POSIX/tcc: .add_tetenv T 10008388
    Test Output
    400|400 16 1 13:17:42|IC Start
    200|400 1 13:17:42|TP Start
    520|400 1 8805 1 1|Assertion #16 (C): Assertion 16 in section 5.21.2 of standard
    P1003.3.2/D9.
    520|400 1 8805 1 1|Output differs from expected.
    520|400 1 8805 1 2|First 60 lines of diff of "nm_cut_16_s" and "nm_cut_16":
    520|400 1 8805 1 3|*** nm_cut_16_s Sat Jul 29 13:17:44 1995
    520|400 1 8805 1 4|--- nm_cut_16 Sat Jul 29 13:17:45 1995
    520|400 1 8805 1 5|***************
    520|400 1 8805 1 6|*** 1,3 ****
    520|400 1 8805 1 7|--- 1,26 ----
    520|400 1 8805 1 8|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 9|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 10|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 11|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 12|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 13|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 14|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 15|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 16|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 17|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 18|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 19|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 20|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 21|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 22|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 23|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 24|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 25|+ b
    520|400 1 8805 1 26|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 27|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 28|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 29|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 30|+ s
    520|400 1 8805 1 31| .L374
    520|400 1 8805 1 32| .L375
    520|400 1 8805 1 33| .L416
    520|400 1 8805 1 34|***************
    520|400 1 8805 1 35|*** 37,43 ****
    520|400 1 8805 1 36| analyze_jnl_entry
    520|400 1 8805 1 37| atexit
    520|400 1 8805 1 38| atoi
    520|400 1 8805 1 39|- b
    520|400 1 8805 1 40| basename
    520|400 1 8805 1 41| bld_cfg_file_name
    520|400 1 8805 1 42| bld_env
    520|400 1 8805 1 43|--- 60,65 ----
    520|400 1 8805 1 44|***************
    520|400 1 8805 1 45|*** 212,239 ****
    520|400 1 8805 1 46| rewind
    520|400 1 8805 1 47| rmdir
    520|400 1 8805 1 48| rootp
    520|400 1 8805 1 49|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 50|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 51|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 52|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 53|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 54|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 55|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 56|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 57|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 58|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 59|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 60|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 61|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 62|- s
    520|400 1 8805 1 63|...omitting remaining 12 lines.
    220|400 1 1 13:18:11|FAIL

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    We agree this is a test suite deficiency in the test
    suite version(s) listed.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Review Conclusion
    This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   


Contact the Certification Authority