HomeAbout Us A-Z IndexSearch * Contact Us Register LoginPress Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System


Problem Report 0830 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 0830.


Report 0830 Actions


    Problem Report Number 0830
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0345
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published 1996-02-21 08:00
    Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSC version 4.1.5
    Test Identification POSIX.annexA/lex 89
    Problem Summary TSD4C.00166 This test may fail on implementations where the object format does not provide the symbolic information in the format expected.
    Problem Text
    This test may fail on implementations where the object format
    does not provide the symbolic information in the format expected.

    The part of the test that's failing is where it checks that the symbol
    "yylex" is reported by the "nm" utility. According to the Output Files
    section of the c89 command in XPG4 Commands and Utilities:

    "Object files or executable files or both are produced in
    unspecified formats."

    Symbols such as the names of functions in binary executable files
    produced by c89 on our platform may not necessarily retain their
    initial names:

    - lower case letters are folded to uppercase

    - special symbols such as the underscore are replaced by other
    acceptable characters

    - symbols with names longer than 8 characters are truncated to
    their first 8 characters

    - name collisions are resolved by assigning an arbitrary unique
    name to a symbol (such as @SYM0001).

    It is not portable to expect that the function name "yylex" will show
    up in output from the nm utility. On some platforms, it may be
    changed in some manner.
    Test Output
    TP Start
    Assertion #89 (D): Test the yylex() definition in generated code
    Command failed: '[ 0 -gt 0 ]'
    FAIL

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    We agree this is a test suite deficiency in the test
    suite version(s) listed.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Review Conclusion
    This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   


Contact the Certification Authority