|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 0830 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0830.
Report 0830 Actions
Problem Report Number 0830 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0345 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published 1996-02-21 08:00 Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95) Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSC version 4.1.5 Test Identification POSIX.annexA/lex 89 Problem Summary TSD4C.00166 This test may fail on implementations where the object format does not provide the symbolic information in the format expected. Problem Text
This test may fail on implementations where the object format
does not provide the symbolic information in the format expected.
The part of the test that's failing is where it checks that the symbol
"yylex" is reported by the "nm" utility. According to the Output Files
section of the c89 command in XPG4 Commands and Utilities:
"Object files or executable files or both are produced in
unspecified formats."
Symbols such as the names of functions in binary executable files
produced by c89 on our platform may not necessarily retain their
initial names:
- lower case letters are folded to uppercase
- special symbols such as the underscore are replaced by other
acceptable characters
- symbols with names longer than 8 characters are truncated to
their first 8 characters
- name collisions are resolved by assigning an arbitrary unique
name to a symbol (such as @SYM0001).
It is not portable to expect that the function name "yylex" will show
up in output from the nm utility. On some platforms, it may be
changed in some manner.Test Output
TP Start
Assertion #89 (D): Test the yylex() definition in generated code
Command failed: '[ 0 -gt 0 ]'
FAILReview Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
We agree this is a test suite deficiency in the test
suite version(s) listed.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) Review Conclusion
This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 0830
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority