Report 0789 Actions
Problem Report Number |
0789 |
Submitter's Classification |
Test Suite problem |
State |
Resolved |
Resolution |
Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) |
Problem Resolution ID |
TSD.X.0304 |
Raised |
1970-01-01 08:00 |
Updated |
2003-03-13 08:00 |
Published |
1998-02-24 08:00 |
Product Standard |
Commands and Utilities V3 (UNIX 98) |
Certification Program |
The Open Brand certification program |
Test Suite |
VSC version 5.0.1 |
Test Identification |
XOPEN.cmd/ipcs 1030 |
Problem Summary |
TSD4C.00207 This IR claims that the heading is allowed to appear before the facility name line. |
Problem Text |
This tests expects the order of the output headings to be the following: 1) introductory line 2) facility name 3) Column heading While this is the order of the descriptions of these lines in the spec, the spec does not mandate this order. Our implementation reverses 2) and 3).
|
Test Output |
*********************************************************************** /tset/XOPEN.cmd/ipcs/ipcs.ex 1 Failed Test Information: Assertion #1030 (A): Shared memory facility heading TEST: ipcs -o TEST: ipcs -m -o TEST: ipcs -a ERROR: Column headings not found Expected column headings: T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP NATTCH <LC> SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME DTIME CTIME Contents of ipcs_chk_fac_hd.tmp: IPC status from /dev/mem as of Thu Jan 15 03:57:18 1998 T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR <LC> CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIME <LC> RTIME CTIME Message Queues: q 0 0x4107001c -Rrw-rw---- root printq root <LC> printq 0 0 4194304 13014 6970 17 <LC> :05:33 17:05:33 14:32:15 q 24577 0x0a000000 --rw--w-r-- root vscg0 root <LC> vscg0 0 0 4194304 0 0 no <LC> -entry no-entry 3:55:42 q 8194 0x0a000001 --rw--w-r-- vsc0 vscg0 vsc0 <LC> vscg0 50 1 4194304 14850 14850 3 <LC> :55:53 3:55:53 3:55:53 T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR <LC> CGROUP NATTCH SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME D <LC> TIME CTIME Shared Memory: m 0 0x0d051a6b --rw-rw-rw- root system root <LC> system 1 1440 7954 8976 14:46:50 14: <LC> 46:55 14:46:50 m 720897 0x0a000000 --rw--w-r-- vsc0 vscg0 vsc0 <LC> vscg0 0 1024 14860 0 no-entry no- <LC> entry 3:55:53 m 704514 0x0a000001 --rw--w-r-- vsc0 vscg0 vsc0 <LC> vscg0 0 1024 14866 14866 3:55:53 3: <LC> 55:53 3:55:53 T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR <LC> CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME Semaphores: s 4096 0x0105192d --ra------- root system root <LC> system 1 14:47:03 14:35:16 s 1 0x620519a2 --ra-r--r-- root system root <LC> system 1 14:31:33 14:31:33 s 28674 0x0a000000 --ra--a-r-- vsc0 vscg0 vsc0 <LC> vscg0 2 no-entry 3:55:53 s 8195 0x0a000001 --ra--a-r-- vsc0 vscg0 vsc0 <LC> vscg0 2 3:55:53 3:55:53 Expected exit code = 0; Received 1 ***********************************************************************
|
Review Information
Review Type |
TSMA Review |
Start Date |
null |
Completed |
null |
Status |
Complete |
Review Recommendation |
No Resolution Given |
Review Response |
We recommend this request be refused. We believe the ipcs specifies the order of the output in the description. The first line is specified as: An introductory line is written with the format: "IPC status from %s as of %s\en", <source>, <date> The second line when the facility is unused is specified as: If the corresponding facility is not installed or has not been used since the last reboot, then the report is written out in the format: "%s facility not in system.\en", <facility> where <facility> is Message Queue, Shared Memory or Semaphore as appropriate. If the facility has been used, another line is generated, but the facility name output is generated differently. If the facility has been installed and has been used since the last reboot, column headings separated by one or more spaces and followed by a new line will be written as indicated below and the facility name is written out using the format: "%s:\en", <facility> The language used can be improved, but we believe this to be the intent of the specification. A future version of this standard should provide an example.
|
Review Type |
SA Review |
Start Date |
null |
Completed |
null |
Status |
Complete |
Review Resolution |
No Resolution Given |
Review Conclusion |
This request should go for a 14 day review.
|
Review Type |
Expert Group Review |
Start Date |
null |
Completed |
null |
Status |
Complete |
Review Resolution |
No Resolution Given |
Review Conclusion |
The Base Workging group agrees with the submittor of this waiver request and recommends a TSD. In the consultant's response, it states the "second line when the facility is unused is specified as" yet there are no such words as "second line" in the specification. Thus the test should not make this assumption about the ordering of the output from the ipcs command.
|
Review Type |
SA Review |
Start Date |
null |
Completed |
null |
Status |
Complete |
Review Resolution |
Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) |
Review Conclusion |
This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.
|
Problem Reporting System Options:
|