|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 0781 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0781.
Report 0781 Actions
Problem Report Number 0781 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0296 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published 1998-06-08 08:00 Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95) Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSC version 4.1.6 Test Identification POSIX.cmd/mailx 335 Problem Summary TSD4C.00215 This test may fail on implementations that test an existing mailbox to be sure it is not corrupted before appending new mail to it. Problem Text
This test case tests that the mailx 'save' command appends to
an existing file. However, it implements this by first creating
a file with the string "abcdefghijkl" in it-- our mailx does not
see this as a valid mailbox and will not append to it. The
specification page for mailx on page 473 supports our behavior,
since it specifies the following behavior for 'save' :
"Save the specified messages in the file named by pathname file,
or the mbox if the file argument is omitted."
We argue that since mbox is the default, 'save' was meant to
save a message into a mailbox, and not just into a file-- meaning
it must be saved in the format of a mailbox.
We further point to the following in the Output Files section on page
462. This says "Various mailx commands and command escapes can create
or add to files, including mbox, dead-letter file and secondary
mailboxes. When mailx is used as described in this document, these
files will be text files, formatted as follows:.....". The issue it
seems is the test is trying to append to a file not in this format.
This looks to be waiverable given what is quoted above as our
implementation enforces the "formatted as follows" which the file
with the string "abcdefghijkl" does not meet.Test Output
Assertion #335 (C): Appending of files with save <msg> <fil
<LC> e> command
First 10 lines of diff of "/home/vsc/VSC4.1.6/tet_tmp_dir/
<LC> 2739a/mailx/d.mailx/DATA/335.1.dir/folder/mailx_out
<LC> _1" and "mailx_exp_1":
1a2,55
> From vsc Wed Oct 8 17:13:34 1997
> Return-Path: vsc
> Received: (from vsc@localhost) by stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> (8.8.5/SCO5) id RAA01066 for vsc; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 1
<LC> 7:13:34 GMT
> Message-Id: <199710081713.RAA01066@stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> >
> From: vsc@stdpro.london.sco.COM
> To: vsc
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:13 BST
> Subject: VSC_TEST_MESSAGE_2 string
> Status: O
> X-Status:
> X-SCO-PAD: XXXXX
> X-SCO-UID: 1
> Content-Length: 417
>
> THIS IS IN MESSAGE 2
> This is the second test message.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> From vsc Wed Oct 8 17:13:39 1997
> Return-Path: vsc
> Received: (from vsc@localhost) by stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> (8.8.5/SCO5) id RAA01072 for vsc; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 1
<LC> 7:13:39 GMT
> Message-Id: <199710081713.RAA01072@stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> >
> From: vsc@stdpro.london.sco.COM
> To: vsc
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:13 BST
> Subject: VSC_TEST_MESSAGE_3
> Status: O
> X-Status:
> X-SCO-PAD: XXXXX
> X-SCO-UID: 1
> Content-Length: 417
>
> THIS IS IN MESSAGE 3
> This is the second test message.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
Command failed: 'jrnl_file_diff /home/vsc/VSC4.1.6/tet_tmp
<LC> _dir/2739a/mailx/d.mailx/DATA/335.1.dir/folder/mail
<LC> x_out_1 mailx_exp_1'
First 10 lines of diff of "mailx_out_2" and "mailx_exp_1":
1a2,55
> From vsc Wed Oct 8 17:13:34 1997
> Return-Path: vsc
> Received: (from vsc@localhost) by stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> (8.8.5/SCO5) id RAA01066 for vsc; Wed, 8 Oct 1997 1
<LC> 7:13:34 GMT
> Message-Id: <199710081713.RAA01066@stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> >
> From: vsc@stdpro.london.sco.COM
> To: vsc
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:13 BST
> Subject: VSC_TEST_MESSAGE_2 string
> Status: O
> X-Status:
> X-SCO-PAD: XXXXX
> X-SCO-UID: 1
> Content-Length: 417
>
> THIS IS IN MESSAGE 2
> This is the second test message.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> From vsc Wed Oct 8 17:13:39 1997
> Return-Path: vsc
> Received: (from vsc@localhost) by stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> (8.8.5/SCO5) id RAA01072 for vsc; Wed, 8 Oct 1997
<LC> 17:13:39 GMT
> Message-Id: <199710081713.RAA01072@stdpro.london.sco.CO
<LC> M>
> From: vsc@stdpro.london.sco.COM
> To: vsc
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:13 BST
> Subject: VSC_TEST_MESSAGE_3
> Status: O
> X-Status:
> X-SCO-PAD: XXXXX
> X-SCO-UID: 1
> Content-Length: 417
>
> THIS IS IN MESSAGE 3
> This is the second test message.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
Command failed: 'jrnl_file_diff mailx_out_2 mailx_exp_1'
First 10 lines of diff of "+mailx_out_3" and "mailx_exp_1
<LC> ":
1a2,55
> From vsc Wed Oct 8 17:13:34 1997
> Return-Path: vsc
> Received: (from vsc@localhost) by stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> (8.8.5/SCO5) id RAA01066 for vsc; Wed, 8 Oct 1997
<LC> 17:13:34 GMT
> Message-Id: <199710081713.RAA01066@stdpro.london.sco.CO
<LC> M>
> From: vsc@stdpro.london.sco.COM
> To: vsc
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:13 BST
> Subject: VSC_TEST_MESSAGE_2 string
> Status: O
> X-Status:
> X-SCO-PAD: XXXXX
> X-SCO-UID: 1
> Content-Length: 417
>
> THIS IS IN MESSAGE 2
> This is the second test message.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> From vsc Wed Oct 8 17:13:39 1997
> Return-Path: vsc
> Received: (from vsc@localhost) by stdpro.london.sco.COM
<LC> (8.8.5/SCO5) id RAA01072 for vsc; Wed, 8 Oct 1997
<LC> 17:13:39 GMT
> Message-Id: <199710081713.RAA01072@stdpro.london.sco.CO
<LC> M>
> From: vsc@stdpro.london.sco.COM
> To: vsc
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 1997 18:13 BST
> Subject: VSC_TEST_MESSAGE_3
> Status: O
> X-Status:
> X-SCO-PAD: XXXXX
> X-SCO-UID: 1
> Content-Length: 417
>
> THIS IS IN MESSAGE 3
> This is the second test message.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
> It will have more than 10 lines.
Command failed: 'jrnl_file_diff '+mailx_out_3' mailx_exp_
<LC> 1'Review Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
We agree this is a test suite deficiency in the test
suite version(s) listed.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD) Review Conclusion
This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 0781
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority