|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 0663 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0663.
Report 0663 Actions
Problem Report Number 0663 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0267 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published null Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95) Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSC version 4.1.4 Test Identification POSIX.cmd/bc/bc_03.sh 139, 142, 144 Problem Summary PG4C.00009 tests should all scale of some calculations to be either 0 or 20 Problem Text
The behavior in the testcases listed above was submitted to the IEEE
for an 1003.2 interpretation and was ruled to be wrong. Note; that two
interpretation requests #77 and #96 were submitted for this. The second
ruled that the first response was incorrect. The response for the second
Intrepretation follows:
Interpretation response:
-------------------------
Upon further consideration, we agree that the response to PASC Interpretation
#77 is incorrect.
The interpretation on #77 should have been:
(1) the first sentence of the paragraph on page 200 l1570-1573
is poorly worded.
(2) the scale of the result of calling one of the math functions
provided when the -l option is specified, could be interpreted to
be the value of the the scale register at the time the function
is invoked or the scale of 0 (which is 0).
The standard is unclear on this issue, and no conformance distinction can
be made between alternative implementations based on this. This is being
referred to the sponsor.
Based on this, the expected result for the test case could be either
scale(s(0))=0(zero) or scale(s(0))=20.Test Output
************************************************************************
/tset/POSIX.cmd/bc/bc_03.ex 1 Failed
Test Information:
Assertion #139 (A): check sin
Note: The behavior associated with this assertion is currently
the subject of an IEEE POSIX.2 interpretation request and may
change in a future revision of POSIX.2.
Standard output isn't the same as file 'bc_eso_139_1'
diff of "out.stdout" and "bc_eso_139_1":
*** out.stdout Thu Jul 13 12:29:07 1995
--- bc_eso_139_1 Thu Jul 13 12:29:07 1995
***************
*** 1,5 ****
0
! 20
1.68294
20
1.68294
--- 1,5 ----
0
! 0
1.68294
20
1.68294
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
/tset/POSIX.cmd/bc/bc_03.ex 1 Failed
Test Information:
Assertion #142 (A): check log
Note: The behavior associated with this assertion is currently
the subject of an IEEE POSIX.2 interpretation request and may
change in a future revision of POSIX.2.
Standard output isn't the same as file 'bc_eso_142_1'
diff of "out.stdout" and "bc_eso_142_1":
*** out.stdout Thu Jul 13 12:29:13 1995
--- bc_eso_142_1 Thu Jul 13 12:29:13 19
***************
*** 1,5 ****
0
! 20
2.30259
20
2.30259
--- 1,5 ----
0
! 0
2.30259
20
2.30259
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
/tset/POSIX.cmd/bc/bc_03.ex 1 Failed
Test Information:
Assertion #144 (A): check bessel
Note: The behavior associated with this assertion is currently
the subject of an IEEE POSIX.2 interpretation request and may
change in a future revision of POSIX.2.
Standard output isn't the same as file 'bc_eso_144_1'
diff of "out.stdout" and "bc_eso_144_1":
*** out.stdout Thu Jul 13 12:29:18 1995
--- bc_eso_144_1 Thu Jul 13 12:29:18 1995
***************
*** 1,5 ****
0
! 20
1.57672
20
1.57672
--- 1,5 ----
0
! 0
1.57672
20
1.57672
************************************************************************Review Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
This is identical to TIN4C.00001.
We recommend this request be refused and the submitter
use that interpretation instead.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 0663
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority