HomeAbout Us A-Z IndexSearch * Contact Us Register LoginPress Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System


Problem Report 0595 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 0595.


Report 0595 Actions


    Problem Report Number 0595
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0199
    Raised 1970-01-01 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published null
    Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95)
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite VSC version 4.1.5
    Test Identification POSIX.cmd/mv 7, 9, 21, 24
    Problem Summary PG4C.00077 This was refused because it is a duplicate. Use TSD4C.00111 instead.
    Problem Text
    The original test may fail randomly due to expect timing problems.

    The expect script used to check the results of assertions 7, 9, 21, 24 is
    not working correctly. The output of the mv command is correct when
    run manually, but the expect script fails.
    Test Output

    200|1 1 16:31:56|TP Start
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #7 (A): Move with -i when target_file exists
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
    520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: '[ -f dirmv0071.tmp/tetmv0072.tmp ]'
    520|1 1 3587 1 3|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0071.tmp/tetmv0072.tmp
    mv2.inp > /dev/null'
    220|1 1 1 16:32:08|FAIL
    410|1 7 1 16:32:08|IC End
    400|1 8 1 16:32:08|IC Start
    200|1 1 16:32:08|TP Start
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #9 (A): Move when target exists and
    nonwritable and response is affirm.
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
    520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0091.tmp/tetmv0091.tmp
    mv1.inp > /dev/null'
    220|1 1 1 16:32:32|FAIL
    410|1 9 1 16:32:32|IC End
    400|1 21 1 16:32:43|IC Start
    200|1 1 16:32:43|TP Start
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #21 (A): Test GA26: options can be grouped
    together
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
    520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0211.tmp/tetmv0211.tmp
    mv1.inp > /dev/null'
    520|1 1 3587 1 3|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0212.tmp/tetmv0212.tmp
    mv1.inp > /dev/null'
    520|1 1 3587 1 4|Command failed: '[ ! -s tetmv0211.tmp ] && [ ! -s
    tetmv0212.tmp ]'
    220|1 1 1 16:33:06|FAIL
    410|1 21 1 16:33:06|IC End
    400|1 24 1 16:33:10|IC Start
    200|1 1 16:33:10|TP Start
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #24 (A): mv gives precedence to the last
    option specified
    520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
    520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0241.tmp/tetmv0241.tmp
    mv1.inp > /dev/null'
    520|1 1 3587 1 3|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0242.tmp/tetmv0242.tmp
    mv1.inp > /dev/null'
    520|1 1 3587 1 4|Command failed: '[ ! -s tetmv0241.tmp ] &&[ ! -s
    tetmv0242.tmp ]'
    220|1 1 1 16:33:22|FAIL
    410|1 24 1 16:33:22|IC End

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    The submitter is correct but a recent ruling regarding this issue
    exists. To avoid the confusion duplicate rulings regarding the same
    might cause we recommend this request be refused and the submitter
    use TSD4C.00111 instead.

    The issue in question only exists on VSC4.1.4 and does not apply
    to VSC4.1.5.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Rejected (REJ)
    Review Conclusion
    This request is refused.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   


Contact the Certification Authority