|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 0595 Details
Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0595.
Report 0595 Actions
Problem Report Number 0595 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0199 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published null Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95) Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSC version 4.1.5 Test Identification POSIX.cmd/mv 7, 9, 21, 24 Problem Summary PG4C.00077 This was refused because it is a duplicate. Use TSD4C.00111 instead. Problem Text
The original test may fail randomly due to expect timing problems.
The expect script used to check the results of assertions 7, 9, 21, 24 is
not working correctly. The output of the mv command is correct when
run manually, but the expect script fails.Test Output
200|1 1 16:31:56|TP Start
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #7 (A): Move with -i when target_file exists
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: '[ -f dirmv0071.tmp/tetmv0072.tmp ]'
520|1 1 3587 1 3|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0071.tmp/tetmv0072.tmp
mv2.inp > /dev/null'
220|1 1 1 16:32:08|FAIL
410|1 7 1 16:32:08|IC End
400|1 8 1 16:32:08|IC Start
200|1 1 16:32:08|TP Start
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #9 (A): Move when target exists and
nonwritable and response is affirm.
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0091.tmp/tetmv0091.tmp
mv1.inp > /dev/null'
220|1 1 1 16:32:32|FAIL
410|1 9 1 16:32:32|IC End
400|1 21 1 16:32:43|IC Start
200|1 1 16:32:43|TP Start
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #21 (A): Test GA26: options can be grouped
together
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0211.tmp/tetmv0211.tmp
mv1.inp > /dev/null'
520|1 1 3587 1 3|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0212.tmp/tetmv0212.tmp
mv1.inp > /dev/null'
520|1 1 3587 1 4|Command failed: '[ ! -s tetmv0211.tmp ] && [ ! -s
tetmv0212.tmp ]'
220|1 1 1 16:33:06|FAIL
410|1 21 1 16:33:06|IC End
400|1 24 1 16:33:10|IC Start
200|1 1 16:33:10|TP Start
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Assertion #24 (A): mv gives precedence to the last
option specified
520|1 1 3587 1 1|Expected exit code = 0; Received 5
520|1 1 3587 1 2|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0241.tmp/tetmv0241.tmp
mv1.inp > /dev/null'
520|1 1 3587 1 3|Command failed: 'diff dirmv0242.tmp/tetmv0242.tmp
mv1.inp > /dev/null'
520|1 1 3587 1 4|Command failed: '[ ! -s tetmv0241.tmp ] &&[ ! -s
tetmv0242.tmp ]'
220|1 1 1 16:33:22|FAIL
410|1 24 1 16:33:22|IC EndReview Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
The submitter is correct but a recent ruling regarding this issue
exists. To avoid the confusion duplicate rulings regarding the same
might cause we recommend this request be refused and the submitter
use TSD4C.00111 instead.
The issue in question only exists on VSC4.1.4 and does not apply
to VSC4.1.5.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 0595
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority