|
Home About Us A-Z Index Search * Contact Us Register Login Press ShopThe Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System |
Problem Report 0582 Details Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges
This page provides all information on Problem Report 0582.
Report 0582 Actions
Problem Report Number 0582 Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem State Resolved Resolution Rejected (REJ) Problem Resolution ID REJ.X.0186 Raised 1970-01-01 08:00 Updated 2003-03-13 08:00 Published null Product Standard Commands and Utilities V2 (UNIX 95) Certification Program The Open Brand certification program Test Suite VSC version 4.1.5 Test Identification POSIX.cmd/sed 15 Problem Summary PG4C.00091 This was refused because it is a duplicate. Use PG4C.00089 instead. Problem Text
We believe that the test for #15 is not valid due to the following:
The test is testing for an implementation detail of the sed utility
Specifically, it is testing for the size of reads from the input stream.
This does not work with our implementation due to our use of input
buffering within the sed utility (we do 512 byte reads). Since the
input file is only 3 bytes in the test, the entire file is read leaving
nothing for the cat cmd. (The test fails because it is assuming that
sed does byte by byte processing).Test Output
-------- sed
200|259 1 21:58:01|TP Start
520|259 1 26664 1 1|Assertion #15 (A): Test general asseriton 34
520|259 1 26664 1 11|Standard output isn't the same as file 'sed_eso_15_1'
520|259 1 26664 1 12|diff of "out.stdout" and "sed_eso_15_1":
520|259 1 26664 1 13|*** out.stdout Mon Jul 15 21:58:01 JST 1996
520|259 1 26664 1 14|--- sed_eso_15_1 Mon Jul 15 21:58:01 JST 1996
520|259 1 26664 1 15|***************
520|259 1 26664 1 16|*** 0 ****
520|259 1 26664 1 17|--- 1 ----
520|259 1 26664 1 18|+ C
220|259 1 1 21:58:02|FAIL
410|259 15 1 21:58:02|IC End
400|259 16 1 21:58:02|IC Start
Review Information
Review Type TSMA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Recommendation No Resolution Given Review Response
The submitter is correct but a recent ruling regarding this issue
exists. To avoid the confusion duplicate rulings regarding the same
issue might cause we recommend this request be refused and the submitter
use PG4C.00089 instead.
Review Type SA Review Start Date null Completed null Status Complete Review Resolution Rejected (REJ) Review Conclusion
This request is refused.
Problem Reporting System Options:
- View Report 0582
- List All PRs
- Search Reports
- Email the System Administrator
- View the The Open Brand Interpretations Database User Manual
Contact the Certification Authority