HomeAbout Us A-Z IndexSearch * Contact Us Register LoginPress Shop

The Open Brand -- Problem Reporting and Interpretations System


Problem Report 0239 Details

Help Show help | Quick Search | Submit a Test Suite Support Request | Click here to view your privileges

This page provides all information on Problem Report 0239.


Report 0239 Actions


    Problem Report Number 0239
    Submitter's Classification Test Suite problem
    State Resolved
    Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Problem Resolution ID TSD.X.0239
    Raised 1995-09-15 08:00
    Updated 2003-03-13 08:00
    Published 1995-10-09 08:00
    Product Standard PC(NFS) server
    Certification Program The Open Brand certification program
    Test Suite PCNFS version 1.1.2
    Test Identification PCNFS.prtl/nfs/readdir 7
    Problem Summary TSD4.239 The above failure is due to the fact that the client (PCNFS) sends a READDIR request to the server with a count field too small to hold the direstory entry. I took a trace and one can see two READDDIR...
    Problem Text
    The above failure is due to the fact that the client (PCNFS) sends
    a READDIR request to the server with a count field too small to hold
    the direstory entry. I took a trace and one can see two READDDIR
    requests before the failure. Those are for the (.) and (..) direstories
    which complete successfully. However, the next directory has a
    recored length larger than 32 which is the value of count in the request.
    A better implementation for the client testsuite would be to issue
    the READDIR request with a count significantly large so as to have
    enough space to return directory entries. The test can then check
    the number of entries return and eof.

    The release notes for PCNFS 1.1.1b indicated that of the 3 implementations
    tested, that none of them returned any directory entries. I would suspect
    that it is because of the small <count> value. Our implementation tries
    to return as many as it can that will fit into the amount of space provided
    in the request. We return 63 File name too long simply to indicate that
    there was not enough space provided in the request to return the data.

    Once again, I believe this is a test suite deficiency that should be
    corrected.
    Test Output
    10|8 /tset/PCNFS.prtl/nfs/readdir/T.readdir 14:19:20|TC Start, scenario ref 12-1
    15|8 2.3 10|TCM Start
    400|8 7 1 14:19:56|IC Start
    200|8 7 14:19:56|TP Start
    520|8 7 00008986 1 1|NFSPROC_READDIR returned incorrect status
    520|8 7 00008986 1 2|expected <0> actual <63>
    220|8 7 2 14:19:56|UNRESOLVED
    410|8 7 1 14:19:56|IC End

    Review Information

    Review Type TSMA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Recommendation No Resolution Given
    Review Response
    This is agreed to be a test suite fault and it is recommended that a
    waiver be granted on the grounds of a Test Suite Deficiency.

    Review Type SA Review
    Start Date null
    Completed null
    Status Complete
    Review Resolution Test Suite Deficiency (TSD)
    Review Conclusion
    This is an agreed Test Suite Deficiency.

    Problem Reporting System Options:

     

    Back   


Contact the Certification Authority