PR# |
Documents |
State |
Resolution |
Problem Resolution ID |
Summary |
0001
| Accreditation Requirements
| Resolved
| CSD
| CSD.ITSC.0001
| Checklist requirement 76 is very unclear and inconsistent with the base
requirement
|
0005
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| CSD
| CSD.ITSC.0002
| Error in Training focus area in Level 1 template
|
0006
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| CSD
| CSD.ITSC.0003
| two or three examples for Level 1 CFSs?
|
0016
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| EPD
| EPD.ITSC.0001
| Level 1 Template asks for 3 profiles. Only 2 are required by the
Conformance Requirements
|
0002
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0001
| Time constraints for Profiles at Level 1 are unclear
|
0003
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0002
| AD03
AD at level 2 will not have applied skill level for that requirement anymore
|
0007
| Accreditation Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0003
| ACP Boards may operate as panels rather than serial interviews
|
0008
| Accreditation Policy
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0004
| Grandfathering Window too short
|
0010
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0005
| proof 40 hours of training
|
0011
| Accreditation Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0006
| ACP requirements checklist
|
0009
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0007
| L1 certification requirement of 3 interviews is causing some workload
issues for IBM. IBM proposes that the requirement be reduced down to 1
interview.
|
0017
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0008
| Level 1 template leads to over stringent interpretation of Level 1
|
0032
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0009
| ITSC CF10 too weak at Level 2
|
0051
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| INT
| INT.ITSC.0010
| TSDE07 Data Loss Prevention - remove the requirement to define best
practices
|
0015
| Accreditation Requirements
| SA Review Inconclusive
| None
| None
| Accreditation requirement 4.6 (checklist number 47), if interpreted
literally seems to preclude ACP board members being appointed who have
been certified under the ACPs' own program. I do not believe this is
the intent.
|
0029
| Conformance Requirements
| SA Review Inconclusive
| None
| None
| EC01, 2 and 3 time requirement is vague
|
0028
| Certification Policy
| Resolved
| REJ
| REJ.ITSC.0002
| Level 1 people should not serve on boards
|
0048
| Conformance Requirements
| Resolved
| REJ
| REJ.ITSC.0008
| Mismatch "Technical Focus" definition on Certifiaction Homepage
and "Conformance Requirements" document
|
Columns can be sorted by clicking the column headers.
Individual Reports can be viewed by clicking the number
in the first column.
Alternatively you can perform a new search.